This guy is something else.

This war-monger can say ANYTHING he wants about ANYBODY or ANY OTHER COUNTRY. But criticism criticize him, his country, his supporters or, simply humanely state you advocate a cease-fire and peace, and he goes ballistic. 

Breitbart: Netanyahu: You Can’t be ‘MAGA’ If You’re Anti-Israel. 

JPost: Netanyahu criticizes hostage deal protesters.

Opposition head Yair Lapid said in response. "Netanyahu, maybe enough with the whining and your endless self-victimization? You are the most secure person in the Middle East." 

2023, 2024, 2025...how many hostage release deals offered that Hamas agreed to? Many. Search it yourself using DDG. Every time Netanyahu piles on 6-8 more demands that he knows are deal breakers. He does this because he doesn't care about the lives of the hostages. He only cares about his personal vendetta and vengeance.  He launched an UNPROVOKED ATTACK ON IRAN. 

READ Israel-based news providers because our MSM never reports this; Israeli citizens are fed up with Netanyau. Protests against him in 2025 alone. The families of the hostages speak out against him; they can't stand him - our MSM rarely covers this. His popularity is at an all-time low in Israel. 

BBC: Netanyahu accuses Australian PM of 'betraying' Israel. 

Breitbart: Netanyahu Raps Cindy McCain for Claiming Gaza ‘Starving’.

Not a fan of Cindy McCain, yet another example of Netanyahu's fragility. 

Reuters: Netanyahu calls Belgium PM 'weak' after Palestinian recognition pledge.

RT: Netanyahu accuses Macron of fueling anti-Semitism.

JPost: Benjamin Netanyahu criticizes PM Kier Keir Starmer. 

Times of Israel: In call with Putin, Netanyahu criticizes Russia.

NBC News: Netanyahu criticizes comments from U.N. speakers about Israel. 

The Samson Option. Yeah, anything bad that happens to Israel and they nuke the entire globe. How many other world leaders can get away with saying this and remain criticism-free? Trump? Putin? Xi? Kimmy, Jr? Think they wouldn't be piled on by the rest of the world?  

Sounds good. All Jews in the U.S. can lace up their combat boots and fly to God's Chosen Land and fight. See ya, Bye! 

No reason for America to fight or put the lives of our Military at risk for another of Israel's, Netanyahu's or any of its future leader's never-ending Wars.  Trump repeatedly says he wants to stop both wars in Ukraine-Russia and Israel-and-all-its-neighbors. Stop funding and providing military support to both Ukraine and Israel. 

Whine, Kvetch, pi$$, moan, grumble, Play the Victim [repeat ad nauseam for thousands of years].  

Assange has no reason to make this up. 

☝  True/Source (2005)

---

Off topic brief: I read about this thing, maybe you've heard of it, it's called The Epstein Files, I believe. I guess Congress is looking into this matter, which is reassuring, isn't it? Pretty safe to say the public will have full access to this within, oh...two weeks? Because our RINO Congress is so transparent. Things habbening at Warp Speed. 😎 

Everything's GREAT!

Tucker Carlson: Here’s What It’s Really Like to Live as a Christian in the Holy Land.

Self-described evangelicals like Ted Cruz and Mike Johnson have no interest in how Israel treats Christians. Mother Agapia Stephanopoulos has spent years living in the region. They should listen to her.

Transcript: Mother Agapia on TCN. 

AGAPIA STEPHANOPOULOS: The problem is, is the, the lack of awareness that our mass media.

TUCKER CARLSON: I worked at CNN at the time and I interviewed Benjamin Netanyahu about this at the time. I’ll never forget it.

AGAPIA STEPHANOPOULOS: And what was his response?

TUCKER CARLSON: “Terrorists like we do, we have to do no apologies.” But I said “but that’s our church and it’s also nothing to do with this. So what are you doing?” And it was like “shut up, anti Semite.” But I remember thinking maybe, I mean I’m just some like Semi agnostic news Douche from CNN. But like, where are the ministers on this, the church?

Greek City Times: Evangelical Leaders Urged to Hear Mother Agapia Stephanopoulos on Plight of Christians in the Holy Land.

“I witness the deprivation of religious rights every day,” she has previously said[.] 

⏬ ⏬ ⏬ ⏬ ⏬ ⏬ ⏬

Make way for the Anti-Christ!  

Red Heifer Sacrifice Ritual Was Completed.

Christopher M. Brock: Red Heifer Sacrifice Confirmed.

Ushering in the Anti Christ begins when the Third Temple is completed. Shalom! 🤣

The material after the Pagebreak may contain "Sensitive" Content from other social media COMMENTARY or material which is UNREDACTED. If you suspect this may upset your delicate thin-skin, go back to Reddit and TikTok.

You acknowledge this "Viewer Discretion Advisory", voluntarily proceed, agreeing to hold this blog and author harmless. ⏬ 

Trump supports Crypto; Freeing Silk Road's Ross Ulbricht.

Crypto News: Industry support and the Silk Road founder release: what Trump promises to the crypto community.

[Trump] promised to release the founder of the darknet marketplace Silk Road, Ross Ulbricht. If he wins the election, Trump promised to cancel the sentence on the first day.
[.]
He also pledged to support self-custody rights for the nation’s 50 million digital assets holders.

The story mentions Trump has solid and large support from the digital currency community while they view Biden and Handlers as anti-crypto, which they are. The article states Trump saying he'd never allow the launch a CBDC.

Great; yeah! 👍👍

Trump should've pardoned Ulbricht, along with Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, his first time around.

Meghan McCain's HYSTERICAL reaction to Fake News. The universe revolves around her, you know.

Meghan McCain

CNN: Meghan McCain blasts Trump over USS McCain controversy.

McCain was responding to reports that the White House Military Office asked lower-level US Navy officials about keeping the USS John McCain, named for the late senator's father and grandfather, out of view during Trump's trip to Japan last weekend.

 

Nice one, Pudges. Too bad you sucked up the Fake News like a Dyson:

Pudges reads the Fake News about the name of the USS McCain being obscured, doesn't bother to verify the story, goes straight to her Twatter account and bemoans, again, that it's all about her and her late dad. Pudges was Triggered by Fake News. I could be wrong, but I think most people would kind of be embarrassed and humbled by such triggering. Not Pudges. Give her a day, or less, and she'll back on her soap box.

Some guy who said one humorous anecdote several decades ago desperately seeks media attention, hopping on a momentary, topical Fake News story: 

He was funnier as a cokehead.

None of us has experienced the death of a loved one and suffered the degree of grief as has Pudges McCain. None of us. We can't imagine her grief; we just can't. Pudges is the Standard-Bearer of Grief and we must all accept the universe revolves around her.

It's all about you, Pudges. And your dad who spent the latter years of his Senate career, and presidential campaign, promising Americans one of his top priorities is to repeal Obama Care. And when the time came to belly up to the bar, he betrayed his promise to the people and voted to keep Obamacare. Why? It was John McCain's only way to give a "fuck you" to Trump. Wow, what character. What a display of statesmanship. What a two-faced tiny, little, bitter, selfish man.

I'll remind everyone that Pudges, this past April, said that she, "hopes Julian Assange rots in hell." Lots of compassion and forgiveness in the McCain family, huh?

I'm REALLY HAPPY to know the McCain family supports Creepy, Pervy, Hair-Sniffin DEM Joe Biden for president. If the McCain's had stated they support President Donald Trump, I'd be questioning the state of my mental health.

Julian Assange can barely talk, moved to prison hospital, says WikiLeaks.

This is not good. Julian Assange moved to prison hospital.

RT: ‘Grave concerns’: Assange can barely talk, moved to prison hospital.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been moved to the hospital wing of the Belmarsh prison in the UK, prompting concerns about his health pending the hearing on his extradition to the US.

Assange’s health had already “significantly deteriorated” during the nearly seven years he spent inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and has continued to get worse over the seven weeks he has spent in Belmarsh, WikiLeaks said in a statement on Wednesday.

Digital Journal: Swedish court rejects delay in hearing due to Assange's illness.

No one from the court had any comment on the issue to Reuters nor did the Prosecutor's office. Sweden just reopened the rape investigation in early May.

You've probably heard all about this story from the MSM Talking Heads because they believe so adamantly in sticking up for their fellow journalists and truth-seekers. Like the frequent time and coverage they've devoted to Jamal Khashoggi.

Assange has the dirt on Hillary Clinton and the Obama Deep State. Otherwise she wouldn't have asked, "can't we just drone this guy?"

We probably won't hear much from the MSM on Julian Assange. He's more of a threat to them and they are the water-carries for The Left who view Assange as an enemy. Pray for Julian Assange.

Now I understand how Twitter works: Ban James Woods for paraphrasing a quote from The Wire and Emerson but crosshairs on Julian Assange is fine.

Bounding Into Comics: James Woods responds to Twitter ban.

Actor James Woods has responded to his ban on Twitter.

The conservative actor was banned from the platform after quoting the television show The Wire. Woods wrote, “”If you try to kill the King, you better not miss.” #HangThemAll” The quote from The Wire paraphrases Ralph Waldo Emerson.

Woods’ girlfriend Sara Miller revealed Twitter claims the tweet violated their “rules against abusive behavior.”

    Of course Twitter doesn’t inform his followers. @RealJamesWoods has received the following email: pic.twitter.com/2nnnVBVktQ

    — Sara Miller (@Millerita) April 20, 2019

Woods spoke to The Daily Wire where he indicated he will not be returning to Twitter, “Twitter demanded that I rescind my tweet paraphrasing Emerson.” He added, “It now seems they have chosen to delete that tweet from my account without my permission. Until free speech is allowed on Twitter, I will not be permitted to participate in our democracy with my voice. As long as Jack Dorsey remains the coward he seems to be, my Twitter days are in the past.”

And then there's the below, Julian Assange in unmistakable crosshairs. Not linking directly to the account, you can find it on your own if you really want:

Click image to enlarge

From The Twitter Rules:

WATB Twitter CEO and Soy Boy Jack Dorsey, below. I think his issues stem from his inability to grow a real beard and, maybe, the nose ring:

Twatter CEO, Censor and Hipster Doofus Jack Dorsey

Sri Lanka terrorism moves into False Flag territory?

I need to stop searching on [Incident]+False Flag. With Sri Lanka, it's not that the bombings earlier today didn't happen, it's who caused them and why, which are the floating conspiracy False Flag assertions. Plus a number of You Tube videos on the subject, search them if you want. For them, you're on your own.

CNN via ABC 10 San Diego reports Sri Lanka blocks social media citing "false news reports":

Sri Lanka placed a nationwide block on social media sites after more than 200 people died in multiple attacks on Sunday. The government, in taking the drastic step, cited "false news reports" it said were circulating online.

The shutdown, which the government said would be temporary, highlights the challenges the world's most powerful tech companies face in curbing the spread of misinformation and propaganda in the aftermath of terrorist attacks. It also raises questions of censorship and a government's ability to turn off the world's most popular websites.
[.]
"A few years ago we'd view the blocking of social media sites after an attack as outrageous censorship; now we think of it as essential duty of care, to protect ourselves from threat," [said] Ivan Sigal, the executive director of Global Voices, an international journalism and digital advocacy group[.]
[.]
Earlier, the Red Cross in Sri Lanka had used Twitter to push back on misinformation. "Rumours circulating on social media that the Red Cross building was attacked is false and wrong information," they tweeted, adding, "Please refrain from spreading unauthentic and false information on Social Media."

There is so much going on in the above excerpt that I could easily write a 5,000 word essay on the ethical and moral conflict in what is right, and what is wrong, in censoring social media during a horrific event such as what occurred this morning in Sri Lanka. But let's keep going.

I wouldn't disagree with anyone for referring to State of The Nation as alternative news. Their story echoes a story at The Millennium Report. That a group known as Operation Gladio is responsible for the attacks in Sri Lanka.

From The Millennium Report:

OPERATION GLADIO is the Terrorist Arm of NATO (aka North Atlantic Terrorist Organization)[.]
[.]
As a covert terror organization created under the NATO superstructure, its primary purpose it to set up the global environment for World War III as a precursor to the formation of a One World Government.
[.]
Because of the hotbed of religious hatreds that already exists in the Sri Lanka tinderbox, the Gladio overseers know that they can trigger a societal explosion at any moment.

Sri Lanka, Christchurch New Zealand and all the school/night club/work-place shootings, bombings and terrorist attacks all to advance the NWO? Or are there other explanations or theories?

A post at Aangirfan places blame for the Sri Lanka attacks on the Tamil Tigers. Considering the number of recent events where a person, or a group, is "triggered" into violently attacking someone wearing a MAGA hat, causing a critical mass terrorist scenario is all too real. On the flip side, creating the illusion that a (staged) event happened when it didn't is also all too real.

Operation Disclosure lists the week of April 19-25 as a Satanic series of days. NowFaith.tv lists April 21-26 as a series of Satanic days. Both sites note a series of Satanic ritual days leading up to May 1.

I'm going out here, stay with me. This past week was a Holy Week. Today is Easter Sunday. Early this morning in Sri Lanka multiple terrorist attacks occur. If the ritualistic bloodshed and sacrifices said to be part of the Illuminati-NWO has any degree of truth or accuracy to it - and The Royal Family is one of the ruling Elite families - isn't it at least somewhat curious (and coincidental?) that today is also the 93rd birthday of Queen Elizabeth?

Gematria was brought up in two Reddit threads I looked at, both referencing interesting interpretations on President Donald Trump's Tweets regarding Sri Lanka.

Here's one, regarding Sri Lanka and "False Flag":

Here's the second, regarding Trump's Tweet and some alleged interpretation that former Attorney General Loretta Lynch is "missing": 

Hit the Reddit link for the full analysis of the above. What's interesting is not whether or not Lynch is "missing" or if someone is just reaching in an attempt at decoding a Trump Tweet for creating a conspiracy where none exists. What's interesting is, considering the release of the Mueller Report and the timing of the arrest of Julian Assange, now would not be a good time for Ms. Lynch to become ill or to "disappear".

I purposely avoided The Chans and any discussions going on there regarding notions of a False Flag-Sri Lanka connection. Conspiracies don't play by rubrics. Applying gemetria, for the purpose in reaching a preconceived result or conclusion to prove XYZ, intended to manipulate some sort of Groupthink, abounds on the web.

Is it at least plausible that there is a small and Elite group of globalist powers who seek to rule the world? Why is this so hard to believe when we know history has proven to us there have been times where one person sought to control the world?

"Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them, neither persons nor property will be safe."
 -  Frederick Douglass

The Liberal Reaction we expect from AG William Barr's Release on The Mueller Investigation

AG William Barr's release of the Mueller Investigation is scheduled for release on Thursday morning. Barr said there will be redactions and color-coded references explaining the redactions. I'd guess both Barr's report and Mueller's investigation will contain copious amounts of footnotes or other addendum and a list of references that spans the distance from the sun to Pluto.  Maybe there will be artist sketches, clip art, cartoon figures, charts or diagrams for the Liberals. Maybe there will be an audio version of the report narrated by the dulcet and coherent tones of Bernie Sanders. If I had to listen to the audio version, I'd prefer hearing it read by Otis Campbell, but that's just me.

Whatever doesn't fit the Liberal Narrative from Barr's report will be regarded and labeled a cover-up, a scheme to "protect" President Donald Trump or the Libs will blame William Barr, Robert Mueller, James Comey - or someone else (the Mossad? Gilligan? Fearless Leader? No, no, no. Moose AND Squirrel!) - instead of accepting the report for what it is.

ABC News: Barr and Mueller "old friends" for 30 years and Muller worked with Barr on the report's release. 

The Libs will focus on what is not in the report. They will tell us that what's not in the report is "very deeply concerning" to them (key word, "deeply")  and that Barr didn't attain the "level of transparency they established."

What's not in the report, evidence supporting of -- take your pick;  Trump-Russia/Russia-Wikileaks/Russia-Russia/Russia-Other/Russia-The Pod People -- collusion, will be where the Libs steer their narrative. A compliant media will happily be the galactic echo chamber.

Redacted information in Barr's report will be for the usual, acceptable legal standards and reasons -  national security, international security/foreign relations, protecting and preventing the publication of the names of private citizens and anonymous sources - will be met by Libs with great skepticism. Deep, deep skepticism. And concern. A lot of Liberal "concern" will occur. Oh, how Libs normally love anonymous sources, except when those sources fail to uphold the Liberal Narrative.

Jump with me here. Why does Julian Assange continue steadfastly denying Russia being part of Wikileaks and the emails of Hillary Clinton and John Podesta? Could it be because it's true? Assange has nothing to lose, and so much to gain, if he stated, "yes, it was Russia." Yet he's never said that. Wikileaks doesn't have a high failure rate.

Assange has hinted that his source was Seth Rich, whose murder remains unsolved. Rich worked for the DNC and he supported the 2016 Dem presidential candidate Bernie Sanders. You can do your own searches on Seth Rich-Julian Assange. Don't forget to include Guccifer 2.0 and Fancy Bear in your searching. The number of actors in this production are many, yet, there is no indication of one distinct person whose name doesn't appear in The Cast of Characters of Russian Collusion; Donald Trump.

The varying degrees of accuracy, skepticism and opinion of the Rich-Assange relationship, if any, is as contentious as it is conspiracy. But we do know this: Rich supported Sanders. Rich was murdered. Shortly after his murder, Wikileaks dumped a lot of intel. The timing...coincidental? Assange is not the only one linking Seth Rich to Wikileaks. Where's a good Liberal Conspiracy Theorist when you really need one?

We'll also be treated to just how quickly these literate, "luminary", hellbent Liberal Collusion "Truthers" will read the Barr Report. Remember, Barr rightly allocated enough time to review the Mueller investigation in order to provide an accurate, unbiased, factual analysis with its foundation a legal interpretation. Start the stopwatch the moment the Libs are handed the Barr Report and track how much time they take to issue...well, I was going to write...a coherent and rational response. But that, I think, is setting our expectations of the Libs far too high. Deeply, concerningly too high.

It will take some time for anyone and everyone to read the Barr-Mueller Report. Any immediate, knee-jerk reaction from The Left fixating on what's not in the report - evidence of Trump/Russia/Election/Collusion - will be recognized for the the partisan ploy it is.

Remember the original allegation that Donald Trump would claim the election is rigged if Hillary Clinton won? Remember the allegation was that not respecting the results of the election is a direct threat to our democracy? Remember when we were told we accepted the results of presidential elections even though we may not have liked them? Remember when candidates who lose sometimes start complaining that they got cheated? Remember...?

What do you think the Liberal reaction to the Barr Report will be like? Please chime in and leave a comment.

Libs Love-Hate-Love-Hate Affair with Wikileaks.

The Libs hypocrisy with Wikileaks, no different than their love-hate-love-hate behavior directed towards James Comey and Robert Mueller.

Some caps from 4/Chan-News on Libs, Julian Assange and Wikileaks. Click on the entry itself to "embiggen" & enblarge. Toggle through to read the inserts:

The View on Julian Assange

Teh stupid continues...to a degree nothing short of incomprehensible fascination. Or, is it fascinatingly incomprehensible...?

Josephine Victoria "Joy" Behar and Asunción Cummings "Sunny" Hostin...no idea what world they live in. These two are on a planet of their own.

Full, unedited clip available here.

EU Thumbs Down on Copyright Reform

So far, so good, on news with the EU Copyright Reform (EU CR).

The Globe Post - Parliament rejected the bill in a 318 to 278 vote. 31 lawmakers abstained.

The European Parliament voted against a proposed controversial legislation that would require internet companies and users to take more extensive measures to prevent copyright infringement, a bill that was denounced as a threat to internet freedom.

As is "the devil is in the details", the EU copyright reform is overflowing with the devil, especially with Article 11 and Article 13.

Why is this legislation important? Had it been approved, I don't think it would have crushed news aggregators, blogs, social media and others that reproduce copyrighted material. It would have made what now is a relatively simple and fair concept into a deeply tangled mess.

While there is the component of this being a U.S./EU copyright issue, the much bigger elephant to tackle - and really, it can't be - are electronic file formats.

Had the proposed EU Copyright Reform passed, it would have created a mountain of problems, the least severe being reproducing copyrighted text. Text is text. Far more unmanageable is regulating a myriad of electronic file formats.

One example from the failed EU CR is its lack of definition in licensing copyrighted material. ArsTechnia:

...the [EU CR] proposed law does not explain how [licensing] could be done for fragmented markets where there is no single licensing body. Alternatively, online services must "prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightsholders."

Image: CDev

This is nothing new, though. Ask the music industry about their track record regarding licensing and copyright. They've been trying to define and figure it out for decades.

Th EU CR is not a dead issue. The EU Parliament will revive this copyright reform in a few months. CDRinfo: 

Parliament's position will now be up for debate, amendment, and a vote during the next plenary session, in September.

Technology consistently out-paces attempts of its regulation and law. This will never change.

The EU cannot define what it wants to define. I'm not sure any type of government, coalition or organization can do what the EU is attempting. At least it isn't the UN sticking its finger in this pie. The EU CR was thankfully voted down. I don't think they're going to figure it out come September either.

Julian Assange rape investigation dropped by Sweden

Good news for Julian Assange. I think these charges against him are completely bogus and have been all along.

From The Sydney Morning Herald

Swedish prosecutors on Friday dropped their investigation into a rape allegation against Julian Assange, closing a nearly seven-year legal saga that led the WikiLeaks founder to seek sanctuary at the Ecuadoran Embassy in London.

But British police said that Assange still faces arrest on charges of jumping bail if he walks out of diplomatic protection[.]

The UK needs to drop their charges and forget about extradition to the U.S.

Julian Assange