DEMS Triggered by Trump 4th of July speech. Hoyer, McGollum and Grijalva send letter attacking event.

There would be no political entertainment value if not for the DEMS. It takes nothing to trigger these people.

The May 13, 2019 screen cap is from The Jeff Bezos Peoples' Republic:

This issue resurfaced, not-at-all coincidentally in The Jeff Bezos Peoples' Republic via The Duuluth News-Tribune: House Democrats attack Trump's plans to speak at Fourth of July celebration.

House Democratic leaders are protesting President Donald Trump's decision to place himself at the center of the national Fourth of July celebration on the Mall, saying his planned speech at the Lincoln Memorial would waste taxpayer dollars and impart a partisan flavor to what has traditionally been an apolitical event.

In a letter sent Tuesday to the president, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md. - joined by Raúl Grijalva, D-Ariz., chairman of the Committee on Natural Resources, and Betty McCollum, D-Minn., chairwoman of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, Environment and Related Agencies - said the event "could create the appearance of a televised, partisan campaign rally on the Mall at public expense."

Did DEMS say they're concerned about wasting taxpayers dollars? Their sanctimony truly has no boundaries. It makes you feel secure, doesn't it, that these Patriotic DEMS have a watchful eye on our money that they spend.

The Daily Signal: Past 4th of July speeches given by presidents. Why, Bill Clinton, JFK, FDR and others are among them! And...that pretend president Kenyan guy Pbama who occupied the White House for eight years.

QUARTZ: Elegant July 4th speeches by past presidents of both parties remind us of what makes America great.

The two-page letter signed by Hoyer, McGollum, Grijalva (who dis?)

Steny Hoyer signs his name; his biggest achievement in over 50 years.

Give the speech as planned,President Trump, from the Lincoln Memorial on July 4. The End.

Tesla Electric Cars: Dirty, Filthy, Polluting, Earth Destroying, Global Warming Escalatng Contributor

The pure, clean, enviro-friendly electric Tesla cars are no better for the environment than diesel or gas. Climate Change Dispatch:

Despite being recognized as among the most environmentally friendly on the market, Tesla vehicles harm the planet just about as much as their diesel and petrol equivalents, according to a recent analysis by Engaged Tracking, a London-based research firm.
[.]
This is because more CO2 is emitted during the manufacturing of electric vehicles, and the electricity Tesla vehicles in the U.K. require are generated mostly by coal and gas.
[.]
Tesla countered with: "the group’s findings, claiming the comparison of a Model S — a larger model — to an average vehicle is not fair."

Oh, gee - the "[ it's ] not fair" cry from the Left / Earth-Fcukers. What isn't unfair to them? When have they ever been "fair"?

Unfortunately for Tesla, this is not the first study that concluded electric cars proved no benefit to the environment.

From the same story/link above:

The Manhattan Institute published a report in May that analyzed the cost of electric automobiles and their effectiveness to clean the environment.

The Institute’s findings were quite notable: electric cars actually increase the amount of pollution into the atmosphere compared to new internal combustion vehicles.

So far, (and tech can change), electric cars provide no benefit to the environment. This information has no impact or effect on the Enviro-First-Facts-Don't-Matter crowd who will once again don their denial cap and undergo yet another session of flip of the switch.