VP Vance proposes chipping away at 1A.

By eliminating the numbers 6 and 7. 

HuffPoo: JD Vance Rails About Viral Trend After Son Goes ‘Absolutely Nuts’ In Church.

    The vice president riffed on making a "narrow exception to the First Amendment."

    [.]

    It’s likely Vance was being tongue-in-cheek with his posts.

    But his parenting style and commentary on free speech have drawn scrutiny before. 

Had this been stated by former VP Harris, the Right and Conservatives would be screaming from the rooftops about "Free Speech." Even if Harris said it as a joke. Not hearing much from the Right on what J.D. said. 

One-hundred and SIX, SEVEN thousand three-twenty four? Oh! Teh Irony! 🤣 

Will the new way of counting numbers be: five, five-plus one, five-plus two, eight? Nothing would surprise me. 

6,7. 6,7. Six. Seven. Six. Seven. 6,7. 6,7. Six. Seven. Six. Seven. 6,7. 6,7. Six. Seven. Six. Seven. 6,7. 6,7. Six. Seven. Six. Seven. 6,7. 6,7. Six. Seven. Six. Seven. 6,7. 6,7. Six. Seven. Six. Seven. 6,7. 6,7. Six. Seven. Six. Seven. 6,7. 6,7. Six. Seven. Six. Seven. 6,7. 6,7. Six. Seven. Six. Seven. 6,7. 6,7. Six. Seven. Six. Seven.

Meanwhile,  Sec of State Little Marco is busy banning font styles. He has nothing more important to do? 

47 ain't no 45 and this Admin sucks and cucks for its Puppet Masters. 

The problem in the U.S. isn't Islam...

...You've been conditioned to think that way. It's the other group.

After they diminish 1A/Free Speech, they will work at diminishing 2A (they are already chipping away at 2A). You don't think so? Fine. Then sit there like a malignant lump watching it happen. Don't doubt me on this.

2.4% of U.S. is Jewish.

1.0% of U.S. is Muslim. (ADDED: Alt AI states 1.34%).

We're led to believe that 2.4% of the population is such a small number that they can't possibly influence our country or government, but 1.0% can and does? Stop believing the gaslightng, Wake TF Up and NOTICE.

The material after the Pagebreak may contain "Sensitive" Content from other social media COMMENTARY or material which is UNREDACTED. If you suspect this may upset your delicate thin-skin, leave Now and go back to Reddit and TikTok.

You acknowledge this "Viewer Discretion Advisory", voluntarily proceed, agreeing to hold this blog and author harmless. ⏬

More after the Pagebreak ⏬

Dems wanted to conspire with Big Tech to spy on those who disagree with them.

Breitbart: Sens. Hawley, Grassley: Biden Ministry of Truth Wanted to Partner with Big Tech to Monitor Domestic Speech.

Internal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) documents obtained by Sens. Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) reveal that the DHS had plans for its Disinformation Governance Board (DGB) to partner with Big Tech companies to monitor domestic speech about topics including election security and COVID-19.

A memo on a planned meeting between the DHS and Twitter executives noted that it was “an opportunity to discuss operationalizing public-private partnerships between DHS and Twitter, as well as [to] inform Twitter executives about DHS work on [misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, or “MDM”], including the creation of the Disinformation Governance Board.”

The documents suggested that DHS would provide “information to technology companies enabling them to remove content at their discretion and consistent with their terms of service.”

Read the DHS document. Their intent is to spy on people whose opinions, values and ethical standards differ from the Corrupt Liberal Regime.

"Dissent IS Patriotic but doesn't apply to Democrats! REEEEE!"

You Tube and SPLC synchronized Goose-stepping for WHO. Little Eichmanns on censorship patrol!

The Champion Address on the Internet - WTF?

Yes, your films will last forever on You Tube ! FOREVER !

Or at least until they delete and ban them.

YouTube CEO Susan Wojkicki joined CNN’s Brian Stelter this past weekend and said the company removes anything that is against the World Health Organization, the same group that lied for weeks for the Chinese Communists while the coronavirus spread around the globe.

Jim Watkins, 8 Chan owner, says El Paso shooter didn't post manifesto. Watkins called to testify before congress.

C|Net: Jim Watkins, owner of the 8chanHe implies the gunman used an Instagram account that hasn't been active in more than a year.

The statement comes after Jim Watkins, the owner of the 8chan message board, suggested in a YouTube video that the document had been loaded to his site by a different user. Watkins, who appeared in front of an image of Benjamin Franklin, said the site had made law enforcement "aware" of the manifesto when it appeared.

He also suggested -- but didn't state -- that the gunman, who killed 22 in the attack at a Walmart store, had posted the document to Instagram.

"First of all, the El Paso shooter posted on Instagram, not 8chan," Watkins said in the video. "Later, someone uploaded the manifesto. However, that manifesto was not uploaded by the Walmart shooter. I don't know if he wrote it or not, but it was not uploaded by the murderer; that is clear."

8chan, an anonymous forum, is a magnet for trolls, who delight in racist, sexist and politically incorrect humor. Watkins' video was titled "Sorry for the inconvenience, common sense will prevail" an apparent reference to the title of the 2,300-word manifesto, which was called "The Inconvenient Truth."

 Jim Watkins; Image Reclaim The Net

Reclaim The Net: 8chan owner Jim Watkins called to testify before congress

Homeland Security Chairman Bennie G. Thompson and Ranking Member Mike Rogers have sent a letter to Jim Watkins, the owner of the online imageboard 8chan, requesting that he appear before Congress to answer questions about how the site investigates and mitigates “extremist content”.
[.]
The letter from Thompson and Rogers cites various reports alleging that in total three mass shooters have posted racist letters or manifestos to 8chan before mass shootings – the El Paso shooter, the Poway synagogue shooter, and the Christchurch shooter.

“Regrettably, this is at least the third act of white supremacist extremist violence linked to your website this year,” the letter reads.

-
C|NET Archive
Reclaim The Net Archive

Parler CEO says Apple won’t let free speech app update unless it censors content. Apple relents.

Reclaim The Net: Apple app update bans Parler.

John Matze, the founder and CEO of free speech social network Parler, says that Apple has given him an ultimatum – ban “offensive” content off Parler or the Parler app will be banned from the App Store. Matze says he refused and now Apple is preventing Parler from updating its app.
[.]
Based on Matze’s claims, Parler won’t be able to push updates to its iOS app until the situation gets resolved which is unlikely if Parler stays committed to allowing “offensive” speech. This means the Parler iOS app will probably become unusable in September when Apple releases iOS 13, a new version of its mobile operating system, because app updates are usually necessary in order for them to continue working with the latest version of iOS.

Apple has relented, at least for now.

Breitbart: Parler Accuses Apple of Slow-Walking App Update.

Free-speech centered social media app Parler recently attempted to roll out an update to their iPhone app, a common event that many app developers do on a regular basis to add new features, fix bugs, update app elements, etc. But Parler found their update stopped dead in its track as Apple stated that it would have to review the app to determine if the update would be allowed to go ahead.

After Parler attempted to launch the update, company CEO John Matze says he was contacted by an Apple employee via the App Store Connect portal. The employee explained that the Parler app was likely in violation of the App store rule 1.1.1 which prohibits:

    ["]Defamatory, discriminatory, or mean-spirited content, including references or commentary about religion, race, sexual orientation, gender, national/ethnic origin, or other targeted groups, particularly if the app is likely to humiliate, intimidate, or place a targeted individual or group in harm’s way. Professional political satirists and humorists are generally exempt from this requirement.["]
[.]
Last night, the app update was finally approved the delay.

Apple Führer Tim Cook

SCOTUS rules Bladensburg Cross stays; decicion 7 to 2.

SCOTUS decision 7 to 2 !  Not even close.

NY Daily News: Supreme Court rules giant cross can remain on public land.

A controversial concrete cross honoring fallen soldiers can remain on public land in suburban Washington, the Supreme Court ruled Thurs`day.

In a 7 to 2 decision, the justices reversed a lower court ruling that found the giant cross standing 40-feet tall at a traffic intersection in Bladensburg, Md., was an unconstitutional religious endorsement.
[.]
The decision was a final rebuke of the 2014 lawsuit filed by the American Humanist Association that argued the cross’ presence on public land, and the tax dollars used to maintain it, amounted to an unconstitutional endorsement of a single faith.

The group, based in Washington, sued along with local resident Steven Lowe, who lived 4 miles away from the cross and passed it about once a month.
[.]
...the lawsuit said. “As a non-Christian, Mr. Lowe is personally offended and feels excluded by this governmental message."

The American Humanist Association?  Who Dis?

And Who Dey? Dey be Dis fine group of folks.

Didn't search out Steven Lowe. Don't care. Tired of antics like this. "Mr. Lowe was personally offended." You see, he's never felt "excluded". Ever. Oh. Dat's. So. Sad. We can all agree on one thing, never in history has someone suffered such a degree of inhumane injustice and indignity. Never. Mr. Lowe is a martyr. Goodspeed, Mr. Lowe. Godspeed. Enjoy your monthly drive-by.

May this short clip offer all The Libs indulging in a Self-Pity party over today's decision, and whose hearts are crushed, some comfort (NSFW-language):

The Cross:

Above: The Peace Cross, Bladensburg, Md. Below, the nameplate

Bloomingtonistan, MN: Dar al Farooq Mosque Privileges Not Allowed to Other Religious Groups; public property areas surrounding Smith Park erroneously professed as, "private."

The ongoing story, for the past couple of years, on Dar al Farooq mosque in Bloomingtonistan, MN at Alpha News MN: MN Neighborhood Group says Mosque is Overusing Local Park.

Below is an edited version of a video by Third Rail Talk regarding the above issue.

The full version of the video can be viewed here at Third Rail Talk on You Tube and here at Iron Burka. The reason for the edited version is due to the size of the full length video exceeds the size limitations I have for uploading the entire clip here. Please watch the eye-opening full version video.

The mayor and city council of Bloomingtonistan.

Map of Smith Park and mosque:

Soph, 14-year old You Tuber has BuzzFeed writer apoplectic. Calls her a "Far-Right, Foul-Mouthed, Red-Pilling Star."

Click on images for full size.

BuzzFeed reporter Joseph Bernstein is appalled at Soph, 14-year old girl You Tube videos.

[I]f you want a vision of the future YouTube is midwifing, imagine a cherubic white girl mocking Islamic dress while lecturing her hundreds of thousands of followers about Muslim “rape gangs,” social justice “homos,” and the evils wrought by George Soros — under the thin guise of edgy internet comedy, forever.

Actually, don’t imagine it. Watch it. It’s already here.

The video is called "Be Not Afraid"[.]

"The future vision You Tube is midwifing"? I wonder how long it took him to think of that sentence. I bet Bernstein felt really clever after composing it. Or he stole borrowed the line from elsewhere.

"Edgy internet comedy"? Damn straight! "Thin guise"? Not a bit. It's right in your face, which baffles Bernstein and explains why he doesn't get it. Other Libs won't get it either. Soph's videos deviate beyond their Myopic Stolid Narrative.

Bernstein also rants over You Tube as a platform catering to exploiters of right-wing extremism. I'm still laughing at that one. Social Media platforms are purging conservative voices one after the other, as quickly as they can, and YouTube is following right in step with FB, Twitter, IGram, WordPress and others.

Bernstein makes fun of Soph's dental braces and her manner of speaking. Attacking a child on their appearance is so manly. Bernstein must be proud of himself. Maybe next he'll attack an autistic child, or a child confined to a wheel chair, that he sees who's wearing a MAGA cap.

If Soph's message was instead the horrors of climate change global warming, or she espoused the tactics of AntiFa, he'd be fawning all over her.

What is it with Bernstein, DEM Brian Sims and other Liberal 'Adult' Men who pick on children?

Here's where to find Soph's You Tube Videos. Delicate Liberals should not view them. Some material could be offensive (GASP!) And we all know Libs never get over anything they consider offensive. You may want to download and save some the vids too. No telling what may happen in the future for her channel.

Soph's other Social Media:

TWITTER: @sewernugget
INSTAGRAM: @realltcorbis

The kid has a great sense of humor; Anti-Soph Shill Bingo: 

Censorship never works.

Pelosi's Gift-giving takeback, Section 230 - Communications Decency Act

Digital Music News: [DEM Nancy] Pelosi threatens to take back "gift" of free speech online.

In a new interview, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has issued a stern warning to major tech firms.

Pelosi has prepared to do away with Section 230.

Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, [CDA] the most important law protecting freedom of expression and innovation on the internet, states:

    “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”

In short, this law protects online intermediaries – i.e., Facebook, Google, Twitter, Amazon, etc. – from being held legally responsible for what users say and do.  Section 230 also protects ISPs and online services that publish third-party content, including bloggers that host comments on their sites.

Calling the law “a gift” to tech firms, Pelosi hinted that House Democrats will likely remove the immunity provided by Section 230.

    “It’s a gift to them and I don’t think that they’re treating it with the respect that they should, and so I think that that could be a question mark and in jeopardy…

    “I do think that for the privilege of 230, there has to be a bigger sense of responsibility on it.  And, it’s not out of the question that that could be removed," [said Pelosi].

Read more at the EFF: CDA 230 The Most Important Law Protecting the Internet.

Dear Big Tech...The Dems are not your friends.

Section 230...more crumbs Pelosi wants back.

"I don’t think that they’re treating it with the respect that they should."  Is it me, or does that reek with Liberal Elitism?

Putney Bridge Jogger-Push(er) Arrested

The police have arrested the jogger suspected of pushing a woman in front of a bus. BBC:

A man has been arrested by police after footage emerged of a jogger appearing to push a woman into the path of a bus on Putney Bridge.

The 50-year-old was held at a residential address in Chelsea on Thursday morning on suspicion of causing grievous bodily harm.

He was later released while inquiries continue, police said.

The CCTV footage showed the woman, 33, narrowly avoiding serious injury due to the bus driver's quick reactions.

This lady is very lucky to be alive. And so is he, that she went virtually unharmed. But did she contribute to her fall?

The video is below:

Watch as the man approaches the jogger and where the man is positioned. Then watch how much more inward, towards the jogger, her path is.

I'm not defending the jogger's actions, but he had plenty of room as the man passed by. There was plenty of room for both of them.

Then watch the woman approach the jogger; she seems defiant in not wanting to allow room for him. Clearly she sees the jogger, but she makes no attempt to move out of his way. And it almost looks like she is going to kick the jogger in the groin.

In the third frame below, her right leg is raised, she is only standing on her left leg. Watching the video, do you think she is considering to, or in the act of, tripping the jogger?

Click to enlarge.

15 Seconds More Fame for Dr. David Dao

See the post immediately below for the point of this post.

I was asked by a friend, what would I do if an airline asked me to relinquish my seat once I had boarded the plane.

 If I had to get somewhere for someone in a life and death matter, I would explain that and ask that they please find someone else - BUT - if they couldn't, yes, I would exit in a polite manner without the DRAMA of Dr. David Dao. In other words, I would act as an adult instead of throwing a tantrum. Really...Dao's behavior is pathetic.

NO (for my friend) --- if I were passenger on that plane and witnessed the forcible procedure of which Doa was pulled down the center aisle floor, I would not be thinking that the airline is out of place. I would be thinking, "I DON'T WANT THAT GUY ON ANY FLIGHT I'M ON.

15 seconds is up.

Blame The Media for Electing Trump

I ran across this story from July, 2015: Blame The Media For Donald Trump’s Rise In The Polls, by Gabriel Arana writing at the HuffPoo.

The Huffington Post announced last week that the site was relegating its coverage of Donald Trump to the Entertainment section. “Our reason is simple: Trump’s campaign is a sideshow,” Washington Bureau Chief Ryan Grim and Editorial Director Danny Shea wrote. “We won’t take the bait.
[.]
... it’s hard to know whether it’s the right call to cover anything Trump-related, especially since even negative press propels him higher in the polls. 

I guess if the Liberal Media is to blame for Candidate Trump, they would also be the reason for electing PRESIDENT Trump?

The rioting and protesting Uber Liberals should be rioting and protesting the Media.

The HuffPoo is like reading the letters in alphabet soup you vomit up at 3AM, trying to form words from the letters floating in the toilet water.

Rather than looking in the mirror, right now The Liberal Clown Posse desperately blame their losses on others: people, the Soros Funded organizations and countries (mainly Russia/Putin) for losing the White House.

Why not Blame The Media? If The HuffPoo says the media is responsible for Candidate Trump's rise in the polls, then give credit where credit is due. It is the Media who elected President Trump.

It's rather funny - - - had the press ignored all coverage of Candidate Trump, and had the spotlight on Hillary and only Hillary, it is entirely likely she would be the first woman president of the U.S. of A.

But SHE'S NOT. Despite all the devious schemes and character assassinations concocted by the DNC, the Media and the LOUD and OBNOXIOUS Left Fringe, despite the scare mongering and race baiting from every corner of the Liberal World, Donald Trump succeeded.

The Mainstream Media continues crumbling and doesn't know why.

All combined, could not defeat Trump.