Showing posts with label roger stone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label roger stone. Show all posts

Monday, March 3, 2025

Bondi-Epstein, Patel Memes; Short Stack.

Hey Pam Bondi, we're still waiting for you to release the Epstein Files, all of which she said, "are on her desk." 

The material after the Pagebreak may contain "Sensitive" Content from other social media commentary or material which is UNREDACTED. If you suspect this may upset your delicate thin-skin, go back to Reddit and TikTok.

You acknowledge this "Viewer Discretion Advisory", voluntarily proceed, agreeing to hold this blog and author harmless. ⏬ 

Sunday, June 26, 2022

DeepState Durham played us all for fools.

He had no intentions of doing anything. Read the whole story: 

Substack: Durham Played You For A Fool!

John Durham and Bill Barr finally ran out of the clock on Spygate. Why are you surprised?

By Emerald Robinson.

It’s the summer of 2022 — and where are all those Durham indictments you were promised? And where's that much-discussed Durham report? Do you know that you’ve been played for a fool yet — or are you still watching Fox News? Maybe you need another year to figure out the entire game. Maybe you still believe Bill Barr! Didn’t that legendary windbag tell us that the wheels of justice grind very slow but justice is coming?
[.]
...the Durham investigation was simply the clean-up phase of Spygate disguised as an investigation of Spygate. This was perfectly obvious at the time — and it remains obvious today. It doesn’t take two years for the DOJ to prosecute its targets. You know that — right? Just ask Roger Stone. When the DOJ really wants to prosecute you, it’s easy to tell because two dozen special agents in SWAT gear appear at your door in a pre-dawn raid with a CNN camera crew already stationed across the street.
[.]
Durham kept you high on the hopium for four years.

Saturday, February 22, 2020

I hope Judge Amy Berman Jackson doesn't take generic Omeprazole.

 
She might be thinking Omeprazole is out to assassinate her. 🤣🤣

She's the judge in the Roger Stone (mis)trial. Details here.

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Roger Stone Crosshairs image of Judge Amy Berman Jackson. When is a crosshair not a crosshair?

Market Watch: Roger Stone's "threatening" instagram of Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
On Monday, Stone posted a photo of Jackson with what appeared to be crosshairs near her head. Later in the day, Stone and his attorneys filed a notice with the court that they recognized the “photograph and comment today was improper and should not have been posted.”

Stone said the photo was “misinterpreted” and that it was “a random photo taken from the Internet.” He dismissed any suggestion that he was trying to threaten the judge as “categorically false.”

Slightly different image of the above found on Reddit.


LawandCrime.com is the only site for live court video, high-profile criminal trials, crazy crime, celebrity justice, and smart legal analysis. Created by TV’s top legal commentator and attorney, Dan Abrams, Law & Crime brings common sense written and video analysis to the often confusing and always intriguing world of the law.
Anyone hear of "Corruption Central"? The only search result I found was a Facebook account by that name, but its last update is October 5, 2014.

It seems with the limited info available, so far, Roger Stone didn't add the cross-hairs. It seems that the cross-hairs might be related to whatever or whoever Corruption Central is.

So when is a cross-hair not a cross-hair? Well, we have these and these as references. Or is it the sun cross? Oddly, one of the earth symbols is identical to the sun cross.

 Sun cross; Wikipedia

Using the particular image of the judge on his Instagram account is not the best decision made by Roger Stone. But I really don't think he did it deliberately or meant it as a veiled threat. He's not stupid. To the casual observer, yeah, the image likely registers as cross-hairs. Anyone...? Weigh in, leave a comment.

UPDATE: H/T to Pappy who, in the below comments section, noted the symbol preceding "Corruption Central" resembles a Register mark. I am in complete agreement. Thanks, man!

Wednesday, February 6, 2019

A Restaurant Ready Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

If we had a Democrat president, and we had a conservative member of The Supreme Court who turns age 86 come March, and no one had seen this conservative Supreme Court Justice for around two months - do you suppose the Left would be making demands to see "proof-of-life" of said conservative SC Justice?

The Jeff Bezos Peoples' Republic reported that Ginsburg made her first public appearance on February 4:
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday night made her first public appearance since undergoing cancer surgery in December, attending a celebration of her life presented in song.
[.]
Ginsburg did not speak, and many in the crowd did not know she was there. She sat in the back, and most saw her only as they left the performance. [Her presence at the event was NOT announced beforehand].
She sat in back, didn't speak, no one knew she was there until people were on their way out of the performance. That's not proof of Ginburg being there.

How long does it take to recover from facial plastic surgery? We can't overlook that Ruth died and the Dems found a youthful 55-65 aged lady who physically resembled Ginsburg and had the lady undergo plastic surgery so she looked liked Ginsburg.

Realself.com: Various recovery times for public appearances after facial cosmetic surgery.
For a patient to sit down to dinner with friends and not be asked any questions, I believe it takes about two weeks. Occasionally a very dark bruise may not be completely gone but can be effectively covered with makeup. About 80 % of the swelling is gone so the remainder is hard to detect.
- David L. Mobley, MD, FACS
- - -
The hardest part about recovery is seeing the facial bruising and swelling, which can take up to 2 weeks to resolve to a point that you feel comfortable being seen in public.  Two weeks is a major landmark in the recovery.  We call this point being "restaurant ready," meaning that you can go out to dinner and no one else in the restaurant would realize that you recently had surgery except your close friends noticing that you look younger and more refreshed.
- Ziyad Hammoudeh, MD
There has been ample time for creating a Ruth Bader Ginsburg Doppelgänger.

When (if?) Ginsburg does emerge into the public eye, how will we know it's really her? It is reported she attends the Monday night concert event. While, supposedly, no one else there knew she was there...until the end...and no one grabbed their phone and snapped a pic of her? CNN is stationed at the home of Roger Stone prior to the FBI raid on his home and reports it "live". Yet no one - no person, no news agency, nobody - can get a pic of Ruth?

When (if) Ginsburg returns to the spotlight, I think a DNA sample needs to be done, confirming that the person claiming to be Ginsburg is Ginsburg.

Friday, January 25, 2019

Mueller's FBI raid-Overkill on Stone Arrest

FOX News: 29 FBI Agents, 17 Vehicles and lots of guns.
“At the crack of dawn, 29 FBI agents arrived at my home with 17 vehicles, with lights flashing, when they could have contacted my lawyer,” [Roger] Stone explained after a court appearance Friday.
[.]
“A SWAT team, searching the house, scaring his wife, scaring his dogs—it was completely unnecessary,” Stone’s attorney said. “A telephone call would have done the job, and he would have appeared. Mr. Stone has nothing to hide.
MSNFBI's ridiculous riot gear, pre-dawn raid.
Watching the FBI’s pre-dawn arrest of infamous political fixer Roger Stone was like watching a particularly hackneyed Hollywood dud: Twenty-nine officers or agents, armed as heavily as B-actors with Navy-SEAL envy, approached Stone’s house as if on a dangerous commando mission. One would have thought they were trying to apprehend a murderous drug lord or a suspected terrorist.
[.]
In the specific case of FBI raids, ... section 4.1.1 E, which requires that agents “employ the least intrusive means that do not otherwise compromise FBI operations.” This requirement is often repeated in other subsections of the guide.

America is not a police state, and its law enforcement agencies should make every effort to avoid looking like one.
We've seen the Police State in America before.

Elian Gonzalez, on April 22, 2000:

  
Branch Davidian Massacre, Waco, TX on April 19, 1993:


Were Mueller's FBI Forces expecting Roger Stone answering the door with, "Say hello to my little friend,"?


CNN says they weren't tipped off ahead of time, just had reporters staking out Stone's house.

This whole Brought-To-You-By-The-Bob-Mueller-Family-Circus, this overt show of force on someone who never indicated in any way, ever, that he would pose any threat to anyone, sure is a differently-perceived Military/Domestic Law Enforcement performance from how The Left used to feel about Military-Excessive Force-Domestic Law Enforcement.

Media would be providing continuous, 48/14 critical coverage, interviewing every Liberal camera hog (that would be all of them) breathlessly opining their outrage at the over-the-top FBI tactics used this morning at the Stone residence.

This was a performance art stunt by Mueller.