Imagine, one or two years ago the post title would trigger The Blooger Team to email me telling me this naughty content is unscientific conspiracy theory and for the good of the public it has to be spiked.
On August 5th 2023 a Japanese research team published a pre-print that appears to contain the most important and shocking revelations of the covid era.
Atsuki Tanaka and Takayuki Miyazawa, of Osaka Medical University and Kyoto University, wanted to trace the historical evolution of the omicron variant of SARS-CoV2 by studying viral sequences found "in the wild" and deposited in public databases.
In doing this they found around 100 separate omicron subvariants that could not conceivably have arisen through natural processes. The existence of these variants seems to provide definitive proof of large-scale lab creation and release of covid viruses.
Moreover the variants appear to form comprehensive panels of mutations typical of those used in "reverse genetics" experiments to systematically test the properties of different parts of viruses.
[.]
As with all evolution, changes in the spike protein occur through progressive accumulation of mutations. In the case of omicron BA1 there are 37 non-synonymous mutations - that is, points where the sequence of the spike protein produced is different to that of the original Wuhan variant.
Tanaka and Miyazawa wanted to use public databases to trace the evolutionary history of the omicron BA1 spike protein - that is, to answer the question: in what order did these 37 mutations accumulate?
[.]
A surer approach, and the one taken by Tanaka and Miyasawa, is to work backwards instead. That means starting by working out which of the 37 mutations is the last, or most recent.
To do this you need to find a sequence that includes all the mutations except one - and this must be the most recent mutation.
So Tanaka and Miyazawa made a series of 37 database queries using sequences each lacking just one of the omicron BA1 mutations - reasoning that one of them should find a match, indicating the last mutation in the series.
It's interesting to imagine yourself in the position of these researchers, running queries for each of the 37 mutations, perhaps wondering which of them would turn out to be the most recent, and getting the answer.. ..ALL OF THEM.
Well, all but 1 - which makes no material difference.
Their brains must have exploded.
[.]
Conclusion: this changes everything.
If the observations and inferences in this paper are correct - and barring a pure hoax, involving fraudulent depositions to sequence databases, they certainly seem to be - then they provide indisputable evidence that the entire history of SARS-CoV2, at least subsequent to the emergence of the original strain, is artificial.
Someone, somewhere, really is doing all this deliberately.
Where else have you read about this in the degree of detail at the Substack link? Not much coverage. Why not? Shouldn't the public have as much information on this as possible? Who profits from all this?
Create viruses, sell vaccines. What a racket! It'd be nice to know who's doing this.
No comments:
Post a Comment